EVE Search - Official IAC Response to ISS's Escalation of Hostilities

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Official IAC Response to ISS's Escalation of Hostilities

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:04:00 - [1] lol YOU started the war. YOU 'escalted hostilities' by setting ISS to -10. YOU talked openly about taking their outposts on several occasions Now you're crying on the forums because they are responding to your aggression. You made some very unwise choices recently IAC. Bad things happen to carebears to start acting tough and pushing neighbours around. I have one thing to say. IN YOUR FACE, IAC Its Party Time Ö
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:12:00 - [2] Edited by: Butter Dog on 13/12/2006 01:13:45 Originally by: DHB FooFighter And so ISS dig their own grave. Let me step aside while you fall facefirst into the abyss of your own arrogance. LOL Comedy Gold, keep it up IAC. Facts are as follows: * You started the war * You refuse to listen to ISS who asked for war to be avoided * You ignore Counts public post asking for freindly relations * ISS CHANGED THEIR CHARTER IN RESPONSE TO YOUR FEEDBACK * You still went to war with them * You make a big show of it on the forums * You brag more on the forums about your kills And now, in a pure comedy sketch, you claim ISS are the aggressor! Honestly, IAC. Get a grip.
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:21:00 - [3] Originally by: N Solarz about your beloved charter that you hold so dearly: http://www.eve-iss.com/publicsite/charter.asp - ISS pilots are forbidden to enter claimed space unless ISS have signed an agreement with the claiming alliance. Alliance claimed space is defined by the most recent official political map on Eve-Online: http://dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/CRII/Latest.jpg. Travelling in forbidden space is a bannable offense. apparently it doesnt apply? apparently setting up 3 POS'es in claimed space isnt entering? and im sure someone will spin this some way or the other. Well, duh. When someone sets ISS -10, camps their outpost systems, and declares open war on the forum, such courtesys as repsecting your space tend to go out the window. Actions have consequences, hasnt life taught you that?
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:24:00 - [4] Originally by: Montaire That said ISS has raised over 100B this week on an IPO. Guess we know where its going. edit - also, attacking someones station systems seem to be a war. Which ISS needs a vote on. I own quite a few ISS shares, even about 1b in ISSO shares. I'd like to see a vote for that. War was declared by IAC, not ISS. No vote is required. And this will be funded by ISS's private funds. There are some very rich individuals in the alliance.
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:25:00 - [5] Originally by: Montaire Originally by: Butter Dog Well, duh. When someone sets ISS -10, camps their outpost systems, and declares open war on the forum, such courtesys as repsecting your space tend to go out the window. Actions have consequences, hasnt life taught you that? Im sorry, but no. For ISS to war a shareholder vote must be called. Im a shareholder - no such vote exists. That is, of course, IF ISS follows the charter. Er, ISS didnt declare the war, IAC did.
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:29:00 - [6] Edited by: Butter Dog on 13/12/2006 01:29:49 Originally by: Montaire Edited by: Montaire on 13/12/2006 01:26:47 Quote: =Butter Dog War was declared by IAC, not ISS. No vote is required. And this will be funded by ISS's private funds. There are some very rich individuals in the alliance. Im sorry but thats not the way the charter works. For ISS to war there must be a vote. ANY agressive action (ie taking stations or POS's) that are not a DIRECT threat to the ISS station sov is a war of agression, not defense. And that is somthing that MUST be voted on for ISS to stay true to the charter. Are you completely retarded? What part of IAC DECLARED THE WAR don't you understand? You do know what this fight is taking place 1 JUMP away from an ISS station, and key trade route, don't you?
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:32:00 - [7] Originally by: Tehyarec Originally by: Butter Dog LOL Comedy Gold, keep it up IAC. Facts are as follows: * You started the war * You refuse to listen to ISS who asked for war to be avoided * You ignore Counts public post asking for freindly relations * ISS CHANGED THEIR CHARTER IN RESPONSE TO YOUR FEEDBACK * You still went to war with them * You make a big show of it on the forums * You brag more on the forums about your kills And now, in a pure comedy sketch, you claim ISS are the aggressor! Honestly, IAC. Get a grip. To think I held some amount of respect for you during the 9UY war. How wrong I was to do so. "Fact" is that you're the one making the show on these forums, being the most vocal thread spammer in these threads, and you are not even in ISS anymore. You just seem to like fueling the fire for whatever reason, with stupid comments nonetheless. We didn't engage in station-taking first (nor did I see any indication of plans to do so, for that matter), ISS did by. And of course as expected called in their precious mercs after being unable to handle things themselves and getting their asses handed to them. And then, together they start POS-spamming our outpost system. Not to mention the suspiciously fast and organized ISS+MC+VETO+whoever assault response in general, even though MC was supposed to be on another contract. Not planned? I wonder. So stop sputtering nonsense already. If someone needs to get a grip on things, it appears to be you. Smacking from the sidelines ftl. At any rate, time will tell what happens, the gloves are apparently off on both sides. And as a final note, I post this only as a personal thing, I don't represent my corp/alliance with this in any official shape or form or capacity. Fine, you say I'm posting rubbish. In that case, enlighten the readers. Which of my 'facts' as posted is actually not true. Go right ahead and educate people. IAC crying about being attacked in a war that they started is just about the funniest thing I have read on this forum... well, ever.
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:38:00 - [8] Originally by: Hand Originally by: Marovinchian FFS....will someone put a shock collar on butter nub....posting every 3 minutes is just rediculous. Oh, and i would just like to say the results of the big shock and awe blob thus far have been hilarious. 2 iss friendlies killed, 1 iac stilletto killed 1 MC maelstrom lost gg I think I will put this in my bio. Hand! Have you come outside your POS shields yet? Sorry I had to retract my wardec on you, this was much more fun.
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:42:00 - [9] Edited by: Butter Dog on 13/12/2006 01:42:22 Originally by: RichThugster Originally by: Butter Dog Hand! Have you come outside your POS shields yet? Sorry I had to retract my wardec on you, this was much more fun. butter have you undocked in anything other than a covert ops on your alt? and im sure it was load of fun making an idiot of yourself on the forums. its fun for everyone else Hand is nothing to do with IAC or ISS, me and him both pirates in the same area of space sometimes, and we don't really like the competition. Not that he ever ventures out his POS shield, hence my comment.
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:46:00 - [10] Originally by: Del369 butters a little whisper passed my way as well, the 2 iss friendlies killed in zxic, were you one of them per chance ? No, afraid not. Piloting ships and forum ****ing don't really go well together :)
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:52:00 - [11] Originally by: maGz Problem is - aren't ISS risking the outposts by attacking IAC as well? Bit of a dilemma... Simple answer: No.
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 02:04:00 - [12] Originally by: Montaire Originally by: Korvus The best defense is a good offense. Totally against the ISS charter. The ISS is not an agressive alliance, and wars of agression are forbidden by its charter. If you are a shareholder in ISS, it is in your interest that the stations, and routes to those stations, are kept open for neutral traffic. The action today is taking place in F4, 1 jump from an ISS station, and blocking the key route to Empire. If ISS do NOT take action to ensure the protection of its assets, the outposts, and trade routes, your investment will be worth nothing. This is a very smart move, it takes the fighting out of ISS systems.
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 02:05:00 - [13] Originally by: Marovinchian Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: maGz Problem is - aren't ISS risking the outposts by attacking IAC as well? Bit of a dilemma... Simple answer: No. If you think turning this into a conquestial style war (i.e. pos'ing up enemy system) you aren't risking iss outposts....you are as ignorant as you are loose lipped. I've met groups of 75 year old women playing cribbage who talk less than you. STFU kk, well, take the stations then see ya
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 02:07:00 - [14] Originally by: Layla Currie Lets do a rundown ISS uses spies to offline iac pos and lay their own. ISS hacks one of the iac member's forums and completely wipes their database. GJ ISS you guys make yourselves to look like honorable opponents. You're display today was absolutely pathetic, you have sealed your fate when you made the moves today. MC you have no idea what you just got yourself into, not only did you destroy any credibility as an actual merc alliance by out of the blue showing up with a new contract, but you will find that you have just opened pandora's box. I'm sure MC are simply quaking in their boots at a PRI alt shouting at them in such a nasty, nasty way. Post with your main or get out this forum.
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 02:27:00 - [15] Originally by: maGz Originally by: Red Horseman And may this thread get locked I have to agree with above statement Yup, makes IAC look like utter t-a-r-d-s
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 02:38:00 - [16] Edited by: Butter Dog on 13/12/2006 02:38:05 Originally by: Marovinchian Princess Buttercup, i hope your forum ban lasts a looong time....for the sake of bleeding eyes and your own alliances image I'm not in ISS atm, when I am, I won't be posting. Simple really. I don't represent the alliance in any way right now, so it would only make ISS 'look bad' to exceptionally stupid individuals who failed to grasp the fact I do not represent them. And to be honest, who cares about people like that?
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 02:47:00 - [17] Originally by: Marovinchian Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 13/12/2006 02:38:05 Originally by: Marovinchian Princess Buttercup, i hope your forum ban lasts a looong time....for the sake of bleeding eyes and your own alliances image I'm not in ISS atm, when I am, I won't be posting. Simple really. I don't represent the alliance in any way right now, so it would only make ISS 'look bad' to exceptionally stupid individuals who failed to grasp the fact I do not represent them. And to be honest, who cares about people like that? seriously kid, when you are spamming on teh forums regarding the inner political workings of the whole situation blatantly trying to state matters in favor of one particular entity YOU ARE REPRESENTING THAT ENTITY, whether they want you too or not and whether the character you post with is in the alliance or not. Please FFS take some Immodium AD for your mouth....it's spitting load after load of crap all over these forums Of course I'm on ISS's SIDE. But that doesnt mean I REPRESENT them. The two are completely different things. My personal opinions are not official ISS representations. This really is not hard to understand.
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 02:53:00 - [18] Edited by: Butter Dog on 13/12/2006 02:53:30 Originally by: Marovinchian i don't have to be in a group to put myself out there with the view of MYSELF representing THEM, that shouldn't be that hard to understand..... You're just talking semantics, and I don't agree with you.
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 18:25:00 - [19] Edited by: Butter Dog on 13/12/2006 18:26:50 Great posts all round from ISS and those who see IAC for what they are. I don't actually feel a need to troll this thread anymore, its gone the direction I expected and hoped it would. See you in space, IAC. ps - Wylker, great post, mate :)

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.